The Walden Effect: Homesteading Year 5. Farming, simple living, permaculture, and invention.

Homestead Blog


Homesteading Tags

Recent Comments

Blog Archive

User Pages


About Us

Submission guidelines


Forest garden perennials you can't kill

Comfrey in the forest gardenIf forest garden enthusiasts are entirely honest, I think what we find most intriguing is the idea of a semi-self-maintaining system that gives you food with very little work once it's established.  In case I'm not the only lazy forest gardener out there, I thought I'd let you know which plants really thrived on total neglect (or outright abuse) in my extremely poor soil.

Comfrey.  I planted comfrey directly into the ground, cut the leaves multiple times, let Mark mow the plants to the ground, and then forgot about them for six months until the surrounding weeds were eight feet tall.  When I came back in to hand-weed the spot, I found the comfrey happily growing and blooming, weed-free.  The downside of comfrey, of course, is that you'll never kill it so that location will be home to comfrey forever.  But if you've got space far enough from fruit trees that it won't compete with the tree too much for nitrogen, comfrey is definitely a neglected-forest-garden winner.

Fennel.  I transplanted a few fennel starts into another spot, again directly into the awful soil.  The fennel was run over by the truck, mowed to the ground multiple times, and then ignored, but the plant kept popping back up and even looked so obviously cultivated that Mark started mowing around it.  With its deep taproot, fennel is probably tough to eradicate, but it doesn't run like mint and does attract a lot of beneficial insects to its flowers.

Mint in the forest gardenMint.  I know I'm starting to sound like a broken record, but I transplanted some mint into the poor soil and let Mark mow it down multiple times and drive over it with the truck.  The mint grew so happily that it took over the nearby hugelkultur mound that I'd made for my apple.  That's the major downside of mint --- it's easier to eradicate than comfrey, but spreads much more thoroughly if you don't install a root barrier.  I couldn't tell how much or if the mint was competing with the tree for nutrients, but I ripped it out of the immediate vicinity just in case.

I think that these three perennials are good candidates for renovating poor soil a good distance from fruit trees.  They all produce copious organic matter while comfrey is also a dynamic accumulator of silica, nitrogen, magnesium, calcium, potassium, and iron and fennel is a dynamic accumulator of sodium, sulfur and potassium.  I suspect that the trick to using them wisely is to map out the eventual spread of your fruit tree canopies, then plant comfrey, mint, and fennel in the spaces where the tree leaves will never reach (adding a root barrier if you're including mint in the mix.)  Trees will spread their roots beyond the canopy, but by the time your trees are mature enough to reach this intercanopy area, they roots will be better able to compete and the understory weeds will have produced enough good soil that there won't be such a fight over nutrients.  I wish I'd though of this before scattering the three willy nilly throughout the forest garden!

Our chicken waterer takes all of the trial and error out of clean water.

Want to be notified when new comments are posted on this page? Click on the RSS button after you add a comment to subscribe to the comment feed, or simply check the box beside "email replies to me" while writing your comment.

I'd like to know more about how the different plants interfere with the roots of trees. In my permaculture course we were taught that plant guilds that include aromatics (like mints) are good for keeping pests away, and we saw a few examples where they were growing right up to the base of the tree. These were fig trees, though, and they are pretty tough.

When I wander around in the woodlands on my land, I notice a lot of violets and mock strawberries growing under the trees without apparent ill effects. I wonder what impact they have on the tree's feeder roots.

Not sure what the benefits would be in planting them, except that they may keep other plants form moving in (living mulch), plus the greens and flowers are nice for winter and spring salads.

Comment by Sara Fri Aug 12 12:44:48 2011

A lot of permaculture advocates will tell you that there's no problem with planting comfrey right up to the trunks of fruit trees, but my experience has been very different. When I planted comfrey under my nectarine, the tree was clearly suffering lack of nitrogen as a result of competing with the comfrey.

I think what you have to understand is the concept of limiting factors. In any ecosystem, there's one factor that is available in shorter supply than others, and the plants won't grow more than that one factor will permit. The limiting factor could be light (if you're growing things in the shade), water (in a dry climate), various soil nutrients, or even topsoil itself.

In my troubled forest garden, topsoil is the limiting factor, which means that any root competition is to be avoided. I'm learning it just doesn't make sense to plant anything where the tree roots will grow if soil is the limiting factor, and that I should instead stick to mulching.

In contrast, across the pretty stark line that exists in our yard separating the good soil from the poor soil, the various components of our forest garden island around the peach show no signs of competition for soil nutrients. I have comfrey growing under the peach, but the tree shades the comfrey enough that the peach doesn't seem to suffer at all. Here, the comfrey is actually helpful since it mines nutrients from deeper in the soil where the peach roots don't grow, then releases these nutrients into the topsoil when its leaves die.

I think that most forest gardening books are set up with the assumption that light is the limiting factor (which is the case in my forest garden island.) If light is your limiting factor, the fruit trees will naturally shade out the understory enough that the tree wins any wars and thrives on the extra micronutrients produced by dynamic accumulators and also enjoys the pollinator activity spurred on by the longer bloom season in the more diverse ecosystem. (Plus you can get some edible crops from the understory.) The violets in your woods are in a similar situation --- they probably don't compete much with the tree at all, and can actually keep nutrients cycling by sucking up the nitrogen released by tree leaves in the fall.

Thanks for the excellent question that made me write far more than you wanted to read. :-)

Comment by anna Fri Aug 12 13:11:09 2011

Not too much at all! I'm a fan of lengthy reads.

Thanks for the ecology refresher. That makes perfect sense with the violets. They do keep tiny, dark little leaves when they grow in the understory.

I've been working with succession in my garden, and trying to change the soil in stages rather than letting everything pile up on top of everything else (although it does get that way sometimes, like late summer). Right now it is still open and sunny in my little garden space.

Comment by Sara Sat Aug 13 01:01:10 2011
Trying to wrap my mind around creating a forest garden through succession is always so tough for me! I'm not so good at incorporating time into the picture....
Comment by anna Sat Aug 13 08:17:49 2011

It is certainly a quick succession. It's the only way I can afford to work right now, because I only buy one or two fruit trees per year. I've had trouble sticking trees in the ground around here. There is not a lot of topography that makes it clear why one spot might be better than another. Instead of adding soil amendments to a hole and planting the tree, it seems to help if I garden an area for a year or two and grow familiar with the soil, using good mulches and letting select weeds grow up (no formal selection process, yet), then retire the space to a perennial garden with trees and shrubs.
I haven't lost any plants this way, whereas I seem more likely to lose them if I go out and install an entire forest garden patch at once. Maybe part of the reason for that is that I am trained to tend to that area, so it becomes part of my routine long before the more expensive plants go in. It also works well with the overall pace of my gardening, which I admit is probably excruciatingly slow for folks who are used to intensive, year-round production.

Comment by Sara Sat Aug 13 11:41:57 2011
I should add that unlike you, we are smack in the middle of an open field so my goal is to introduce a lot more trees for shade and habitat. We don't have limits to sunlight-- we have too much! It hasn't been a big issue to move the annual garden every year-- there's always another sunny location(for now)so this succession practice helps me slowly convert the pasture into a shadier, more productive space.
Comment by Sara Sat Aug 13 11:47:19 2011

I love your idea of gardening in a spot for a while before turning it over to trees! That's what people traditionally did in South America, and the idea has a lot of merit, especially for someone who doesn't know that particular patch of land (like me, you, and probably most beginning homesteaders). I certainly killed a lot of trees before I started making them grow!

The Deep South where you live is prime habitat for forest gardening. Light isn't nearly as much of a limiting factor as in areas like ours, so you can really do a multiple level canopy all in one spot if you're careful. Or so I've read... :-)

Thanks for taking the time to write out your succession experiences --- it really helps me think better about mine.

Comment by anna Sat Aug 13 14:23:11 2011

One very unique homestead, $1,500 per acre, the opportunity of a lifetime