The Walden Effect: Farming, simple living, permaculture, and invention.

The last straw

Hulless oatsAs I mentioned before, Masanobu Fukuoka's natural farming helped inspire the permaculture movement, but I ended up being drawn in a different direction by his experiences.  I've been struggling to develop a workable no-till system for my garden over the last three years, and my constant problem is lack of sufficient mulch.  We mow all of our grassy areas and add the clippings to our garden beds and even rake leaves out of the woods to top things off, but I still end up with bare soil and way too many weeds.  So you shouldn't be surprised that my epiphany upon reading The One-Straw Revolution had to do with mulch.

The organic gardening and homesteading movement has us all growing our own tomatoes and broccoli, but I'd say that 99% of us have never even considered growing our own grains.  And yet, grains make up a huge percentage of our diets.  Clearly, they also made up a huge percentage of Masanobu Fukuoka's garden.  Perhaps the solution to my mulch problem is to return to a more holistic gardening method.  If we grew all of our own grains as well as all of our vegetables, I'd never be in need of mulch again.

Fukuoka says that his method of growing grains uses one hour per week per person, a figure that sounds remarkably manageable.  Could we tweak his system a bit, perhaps trading buckwheat, sorghum, or corn for rice, and replicate his success?  I'm suddenly determined to find clover seeds, buy a bit of straw to prime the pump, and plant my hull-less oats in a do-nothing test plot rather than in a traditional garden bed.

Don't miss the sister series on our chicken blog about homemade chicken feed.  Posts so far include What do chickens eat in the wild?, Percent protein in three types of chicken feed, and Recipes for homemade starter and grower chicken feeds, with more to come!

This post is part of our One-Straw Revolution lunchtime series.  Read all of the entries:

Anna Hess's books
Want more in-depth information? Browse through our books.

Or explore more posts by date or by subject.

About us: Anna Hess and Mark Hamilton spent over a decade living self-sufficiently in the mountains of Virginia before moving north to start over from scratch in the foothills of Ohio. They've experimented with permaculture, no-till gardening, trailersteading, home-based microbusinesses and much more, writing about their adventures in both blogs and books.

Want to be notified when new comments are posted on this page? Click on the RSS button after you add a comment to subscribe to the comment feed, or simply check the box beside "email replies to me" while writing your comment.

What do you think about hydroculture? I was reading about it the other day, because the yields are very high, and it seems to be easier to control pests &c. without resorting to chemicals.
Comment by Roland_Smith Fri Feb 5 12:47:29 2010

Mark's intrigued by the idea of hydroponics, but I'm pretty leery. The more I read about micronutrients, the more I feel like there may be micronutrients out there that plants need which we can't provide. I have a gut-deep but entirely unsupported feeling that the food we buy in the grocery store lacks important micronutrients, and that in turn makes people who subsist only on grocery store food less healthy. The soil is a huge reservoir of who knows what, but are we really smart enough to replicate it?

Of course, my aversion could just be that I really, really like to dig around in the dirt. :-)

Comment by anna Fri Feb 5 14:40:01 2010
You probably already know this, but just in case... Don't forget the inoculent (tried spelling it three different ways. I'm sure it's wrong but you get the point) for your clover. I tried some without it and they were patchy at best. Then I tried WITH inoculation and had a nice thick patch of clover. I guess it really makes a difference.
Comment by Everett Fri Feb 5 16:00:41 2010

Such nutrients are only needed in minute quantities. It shouldn't be too hard to add sufficient of them to a hydroponics feed solution?

At least in hydroculture you know and control what you feed your plants. Without chemical analysis, how are you going to tell what if any micronutrients are missing from the soil on your farm?

Comment by Roland_Smith Fri Feb 5 16:30:56 2010

You can easily add the micronutrients that you know exist. But we're still in the infancy of understanding soil and plant biology --- check on this post I made about how many plant micronutrients there are, and note that we only discovered the most recent one about twenty years ago. Who's to say there aren't another few out there that we aren't aware of?

In organic gardening, micronutrient deficiencies are less common, and the gardener can usually figure out what's going on by noticing signs like yellowing leaves. Most micronutrients are naturally occurring because of weathering of the bedrock, and you can use judicious applications of dynamic accumulators to add specific ones.

All of that said, I'm pretty sure Mark's going to get his way and try hydroponics before too long, if only to try to grow a few small veggies inside in the winter. :-)

Comment by anna Fri Feb 5 16:39:41 2010
Everett --- I started to make a comment in reply to this, but it got too long. Then I started to make a post in reply to this. Again, too long. I guess this'll have to be a lunchtime series! Stay tuned!
Comment by anna Fri Feb 5 16:44:37 2010

It might be too expensive for an individual, but it shouldn't bee too difficult to get a groundwater and soil sample from a place where plants grow right, and analyze that with a mass spectrometer or gas chromatograph? Then you'd know exactly which elements are in there and in which proportion, down to the parts-per-million range. Of course that is not a complete picture (it doesn't tell you about which molecules these elements belong too), but is that so difficult? Can plants actually absorb solids? I'd think that they can only use whatever is dissolved in water? I'm not a chemist, but a lot of the micronutrients I saw were metals, which tend to dissolve in to water as ions (from salts).

As for nutrients deficiency in store-bought food, I think that's a small problem. People in the western world now live longer on average that ever before. A couple of years ago they cleared out a graveyard in the centre of Eindhoven that had been in use from around 1300s to the late 1800s. IIRC, the average age of the remains discovered there was in the mid-thirties. The average life expectancy now in the Netherlands is around 80! (of course hygiene and proper healthcare play a large role in that next to proper nutrition). One could argue that we might be reaching the limit of what our bodies as evolved up to now can reach without major genetics engineering. So while our diet could be improved, it's historically not half bad. We just eat too much of it. My employer makes medical scanners, and my department builds patient supports for x-ray and MRI machines. Currently, we have to build these to hold a 600 lb patient! Our bodies didn't evolve to be that heavy. That's a much bigger problem, I think.

Comment by Roland_Smith Fri Feb 5 17:26:05 2010

I like the idea of analyzing the groundwater, but I'm not sure it'd give you the entire picture. Sure, plants can't absorb solids (I don't think), but the associated fungi and bacteria often can, then can give some of the nutrients to the plants' roots. I'm blanking on specific nutrients right now, but there are some that bind to organic matter in the soil and are only made available to plants when fungi disentangle them and trade them to plants for sugars.

I think that our current weight gain as a species could possibly be due to micronutrient deficiencies. Couldn't people be eating much more food than they need because the stuff they eat doesn't have the nutrients they need? If that were the case, I could see our bodies telling us, "eat more!" even though we had plenty of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. But I have absolutely no data to back this part up... :-)

Comment by anna Fri Feb 5 18:11:06 2010
It is almost like an addiction. We have so many carbohydrates in our processed food, and the more you consume the more your body craves and you interpret this as hunger and eat again. So people find their selves "hungry" even when they really are not but just craving more sugar. I think the same is true with salt. The more you salt your food the more you feel like you "need" to salt your food.
Comment by Erich Fri Feb 5 22:53:32 2010

That would only make sense if we could detect deficiencies in micronutrients in our diets. And I don't think we can. That is, we can detect it by the consequences (e.g. scurvy for vitamin C deficiency etc) but not before without resorting to external aids like blood tests. Of course we feel hunger, but I suspect that's rather a high-level thing (like your blood sugar dropping, or your stomach being empty), and not specific as to the nutrients involved.

What I've read (and think it makes sense) is that humans evolved in an environment where food was relatively scarce and took a lot of effort to gather and prepare, conditioning us to eat as much as possible, sotring the excess as fat. The fact that abundant food is available (at least in developed nations) coupled with a sedentary lifestyle and the way we evolved equals trouble.

Comment by Roland_Smith Sat Feb 6 04:35:15 2010

Erich --- I've also seen really good arguments for overeating being linked to psychology. If we're just craving more sugar, how do you break the cycle?

Roland --- of course the same micronutrient argument applies --- do we really know every micronutrient the human body needs?

I'd definitely buy what you said about us evolving to be constantly searching for food. I wonder if there's a way to channel that constant searching into something more productive?

Comment by anna Sat Feb 6 08:08:44 2010
I encourage people to grow their own grain, but I think you said you intend to grow ALL your own grain? I don't mean to be negative but cereal crops do take quite a bit of space even to grow even just for household consumption. I don't know how much land you have to work with so I thought I'd offer the heads up.
Comment by Jerry Sat Feb 6 21:02:33 2010

We definitely don't plan to jump to growing all of our own grain immediately, but I think it would be feasible to work up to that point over the long run.  I did the math, and it would take about a fourteenth of an acre to grow our own grain, which would mean expanding our garden by about a quarter.  That's a lot of extra work, but if we can work out a suitable rotation like Fukuoka's do-nothing farming, I think we could definitely fit it into our long term plan.

Comment by anna Sun Feb 7 10:17:17 2010

profile counter myspace

Powered by Branchable Wiki Hosting.

Required disclosures:

As an Amazon Associate, I earn a few pennies every time you buy something using one of my affiliate links. Don't worry, though --- I only recommend products I thoroughly stand behind!

Also, this site has Google ads on it. Third party vendors, including Google, use cookies to serve ads based on a user's prior visits to a website. Google's use of advertising cookies enables it and its partners to serve ads to users based on their visit to various sites. You can opt out of personalized advertising by visiting this site.