The Walden Effect: Homesteading Year 5. Farming, simple living, permaculture, and invention.

Homestead Blog


Homesteading Tags

Recent Comments

Blog Archive

User Pages


About Us

Submission guidelines


Sepp Holzer's Permaculture

Sepp Holzer's PermacultureSepp Holzer's Permaculture is a book that I recommend checking out of the library, but probably not buying unless you happen to live in high elevation Europe or have an obsession with heavy machinery.

Sepp Holzer writes about techniques he uses on his 111 acre farm (the Krameterhof), which sits around 5,000 feet above sea level on the southern slope of the Schwarzenberg Mountain in Austria.  Throughout the book, Holzer brags about what he can grow at such a high elevation, but from a U.S. perspective, it's not so unique --- I'm pretty sure he lives in the equivalent of zone 5 (one zone colder than us).

What I enjoyed most about the book is the way Holzer developed his own type of permaculture based on youthful experiments imitating natural cycles.  He started farming in 1962 at the age of 19, and only learned about the permaculture movement in 1995, but he was practicing permaculture long before that.  As a result, Holzer's book is full of permaculture Hugelkulturtechniques you won't find anywhere else --- he's not simply regurgitating Mollison's ideas (or anyone else's).  On the down side, some of the illustrations in the book seem to represent flights of fancy that Holzer hasn't yet put into practice, so be sure to take the non-photographic ramblings with a grain of salt.

The other problem I had with Holzer's book is his obsession with moving lots of earth around.  Yes, his terraces, ponds, hugelkultur mounds (simply called "raised beds" in the book), humus storage ditches (aka dry weather swales), and underground shelters are useful and pretty, but they aren't very appropriate to small scale permaculturalists who don't happen to have an excavator at their beck and call.  That said, it was easy to find four topics in his book applicable to the backyard (or at least the small scale farm), which I'll regale you with this week at lunchtime.

This post is part of our Sepp Holzer's Permaculture lunchtime series.  Read all of the entries:

Want to be notified when new comments are posted on this page? Click on the RSS button after you add a comment to subscribe to the comment feed, or simply check the box beside "email replies to me" while writing your comment.

Anna: I seeded a carboard food take-out (clam shell) container with onion seeds. This morning I was moving it to the green house when the clam shell container folded shut (will cut the 2 halves apart in the future).

I carefully removed what I figured was the dirt and sprouts that fell on top of the other sprouts. Brought them in the house and spent the next HOUR carefully transplanting each delicat onion sprount into 2 big containers. I misted the sprouts often to keep their little tails from drying out.

Do you think these transplanted sprouts will have a 50/50 chance of growing up? I am leaving the others out in the green house and letting them fight to survive the avalanch that just happened in their life. Ha! Ha!

Comment by Mona Mon Feb 27 14:36:18 2012
Mona --- I'll bet nearly all of them will make it. I was actually out transplanting onions into the garden as you typed this, and I'd seeded them so heavily I had pull each seedling apart. I'm betting most of them survive having their roots messed with.
Comment by anna Mon Feb 27 15:32:06 2012
The greenhouse I purchased mine at plants 6x6 square pots and the onions are as thick as grass. I tore a bunch of them apart when planting and they always did well. Now that I grow my own seeds I plant them the same way and they always do great. If you are worried it will weaken them, you can clip a bit of the top off of the onion so the root doesn't have to support the full plant. After planting mine, I clip my onions and leeks about halfway down and after the first week or two they grow stronger and faster than the ones I didn't clip.
Comment by Dustin Mon Feb 27 21:12:31 2012
Dustin --- That makes me feel better about yesterday's transplanting expedition. I probably should have snipped off the tops --- I will next time!
Comment by anna Tue Feb 28 08:22:30 2012

Why not use an excavator if your land stretches out over 1200 feet of elevation like Mr. Holzer's does? It doesn't mean you'd have to buy one. You can easily rent them. And it is basically a one-time expense. Trying to do with a spade what an excavator can do in a day would take depressingly long, I suspect.

Austria has been a cultured landscape for centuries if not milennia. So even on mountains such as the Schwarzenberg there are adequate access roads. Just look at the pictures on his website. The winter 2006 pictures are especially nice.

If you look at the pictures taken from the air comparing his land to that of his neighbours, the difference is stunning.

Comment by Roland_Smith Tue Feb 28 14:57:45 2012

I'm not saying you should never use heavy machinery, but his use turned me off for a couple of reasons. First, even if it's entirely appropriate for his property, the techniques are much harder to bring to the small-scale, which is what most backyard permaculture readers are going to be trying to do.

Second, I question why he needs to turn his entire property into an agricultural area. If his goal is just to make a living off the land, I suspect he could have done that in a third the area or less, then let the more remote regions return to wild forest. He does mark about a fifth of the property as wilderness on his map, but I think we should tithe much more land area than that to nature. Using heavy machinery makes it so easy to access formerly unaccessible spots that we end up pushing nature to the sidelines. The great thing about hand tools is that they hold us back to only cultivating what we really need to.

Comment by anna Tue Feb 28 15:53:30 2012

From what I can tell, his goal is to be an educator (and a tinkerer, I can sympathize with that :-) ) rather than a homesteader. His piece of land looks a lot nicer than the rather barren surroundings.

With regard to your last point, lack of power tools seems a poor substitute for common sense. People were doing stupid things long before power tools existed. :-)

Comment by Roland_Smith Tue Feb 28 17:37:22 2012

First thanks for the review of the book. I wondered if Sepp did anything smaller scale after viewing his videos. Guess not!

Re: what you said: "He does mark about a fifth of the property as wilderness on his map, but I think we should tithe much more land area than that to nature."

I don't know if he goes over this in his book, but I've seen a video where he talks about the "natural" landscape of his home being pines with shallow soil that causes lots of flood problems. I can't remember whether or not the pines were a result of humans or not. Anyway, it was my understanding that his cultivation was to show that another option was available than pines that nurture more and more acidic soil.

Comment by Chris. Tue Feb 28 17:46:39 2012

Roland --- I agree with you about his goal, and I totally agree that it can be tough to put limits on your projects when you're experimenting. But it still seems a little extreme to need to terrascape nearly a hundred acres....

(See below about the neighboring properties.)

Chris --- I haven't read his other English Book "Rebel Farmer", so there might be smaller scale stuff in there. (It's less available because I believe it's out of print.)

From this book, I think that the neighboring landscape is all pine plantations, a bit like you'll find in the US Deep South. So the aerial photos Roland saw weren't comparing native woodland to Holzer's property --- they were comparing a pine monoculture. I don't have anything good to say about pine plantations, and I'm positive Holzer's property is ten times more biologically active than that!

Comment by anna Tue Feb 28 18:52:50 2012

Please don't take this as a knock on your homesteading adventures... just wanted to point out that there's more than one way to skin a proverbial cat! If everyone lived on 50 acres, sure, maybe I'd agree that you'd farm a couple of those acres and wild the rest. But most people live in cities, to which food must be trucked from farms, which must produce food for many more people than live on the farm. If you're only subsisting, you're not farming -- and you're little better off than the African subsistence farmers who grace the pages of National Geographic.

Also, the rest of the USA, let alone the planet, is not climactically identical to Virginia. Out here in the arid West (Colorado), a "small family farm" typically runs over a thousand acres; multiply that by 5 for Montana and Wyoming. I have spent time on farms larger than 50 square miles. The climate dictates larger spreads for nominal production, and land area to be worked dictates the use of heavy equipment for almost any task.

Let's not forget that in ancient times, geo-engineering projects were accomplished with human labor -- often thousands of slaves. They built dams, aqueducts, terraces -- massive earthmoving and construction projects. However, being that today it's more difficult to find a reliable source of slaves than it is to hire an excavator or a bulldozer,... :-)

Point being, you scale down from Holzer. I scale up. Way up. Just one of our clients can heal more land and sequester more carbon than a thousand suburbanites with backyard chicken coops. The sooner we can replace millions of acres of sterile, chemical-warfare monoculture with Krameterhofs, the better. Think big!

Comment by Mike Thu Oct 2 03:35:33 2014

One very unique homestead, $1,500 per acre, the opportunity of a lifetime