We actually get this
question a lot, so I thought I'd answer in a post so I can point later
readers here. For those who aren't familiar with rocket stoves, they were developed as an
efficient cook stove for countries where folks still largely heat their
food with wood. The design channels all of a fire's heat into a
very specific area around a pot and uses preheating
of the combustion air and insulation to achieve high efficiency
with low cost materials. One of these days, we may build a rocket
stove for summer cooking, but since I spend so much time processing all
of our homegrown produce, I don't think I'd have the patience to use a
higher work stove at the moment.
Of
course, that's not what Phil was talking about --- he wanted to know
why we don't heat our home with a rocket stove. While I don't
have the data to back this up, I suspect that our scientifically
designed, high
efficiency wood stove
is a more effective space heater than any homemade rocket stove we
could come up with. Our little Jotul uses the same preheating and
insulation concepts as the rocket stove, and I can attest to the fact
that the smoke coming out the chimney is usually completely clear as
long as I'm burning dry wood. We also burn a fraction of the wood
our neighbors do.
On the other hand, Phil
is completely correct that you get more efficiency from any fire if you
burn it hot rather than damping it down --- that's why we chose a small
wood stove that fits
our small space and burns little chunks of wood on "high" all
day. However, heating with a wood stove overnight requires you to
damp the stove down (unless you buy a pellet stove, which doesn't seem
very sustainable to me). A rocket stove would be a very bad
option for overnight heating since the ones I've seen require you to
feed small pieces of wood into the stove very frequently --- I prefer
to damp her down and sleep.
What does
make sense for overnight wood heating is adding more thermal mass
around any kind of stove. This is how the rocket mass stove (the
heating version) works --- a huge mass of masonry stores heat while the
stove is running during the day, then radiates that warmth back into
the room when the stove burns down. Our trailer has weight
restrictions, so we can't go overboard with massive cob-type stove
surrounds the way some folks do, but one of these days I do plan to
tile the living room floor to capture the great passive solar heat
coming in our south-facing windows on winter days. Our slow but
sure progress on insulating our space will also help.
A small masonry heater is around 1750 lb. If that is too much for your trailer's frame, you can get around that by putting a foundation for it (e.g. a slab of concrete) directly on the ground under your trailer. On that foundation you can use e.g. cinderblocks to built support "towers" in between the steel beams of the trailer's frame to carry the weight of the masonry heater.
This is more or less the same as how fireplaces used to be built in wooden houses.
The German wikipedia page for the Kachelofen has some interesting performance graphs.
Hey I was referenced in a homesteading blog! Just for full disclosure, I have never owned used or seen(in person)one of these Rocket mass heater stoves, but I have used regular wood stove and built and used one of the cook type rocket stoves as illustrated at the top of the posting.
It is amazing with the cook stoves how much energy is in a few twigs. They light quickly, and once heated up are completely smoke free. It will bring a small pot of water to a boil in very few minutes. We take it camping with us to cook with because it is less hastle than a Coleman gas stove. But it is not a "gather round the campfire" thing, the heat is condensed on the pot. So it is really hot or you don't feel the heat. Not good for warming your cold backside.
But as Anna mentioned, adding mass makes a HUGE difference. They (Ernie and Erica) at Permies http://www.richsoil.com/rocket-stove-mass-heater.jsp claim to build one fire of a small bundle of sticks, and it keeps thier small home warm for days. They have videos and diagrams, including the one that Anna used, and it will explain the Rocket Mass Heater concept better than I could. It looks incredible.
I can see that the weight would be too much for the floor of a mobile home. It would require substantial additional support to do it. But if you would put all that mass under the floor to support the mass on the floor, why not move the heater into the crawl space under the house. This would save space in the house and keep dirt from the sticks and ashes out of the house, if the fill tube was outside.
I just wanted to say that I am so inspired by this blog, it is a true roadmap for freedom.
Sorry for being so long winded.